Free Ex4 To Mq4 Decompiler Software

IgnoredI never heard about any decompiled 600+ code. I met quite a few advertisements (send me money and then. If it were true, at least someone would report decompiled source. But no one did afaik. Anyway, I am really curious how a 500kB decompiled indicator source with many included classes would look like, i.e. Whether the variable names or class names are readable in their original names etc. I have difficulties to understand my fully commented source myself, so the question is if someone else could decipher the decompiled source.

I would doubt that someone would post their decompiled code to these forums. Decompiling code in the past was easy because everyone could just just download the necessary software online for free. Now if you actually have to pay someone to do the task he probably is going to charge a lot of money (if it is not an automated process but hours of work have to go into it it's even more pricey). A decompilation is always possible it's just a question about if it's worth it. You can be certain that variable names will not be the same and even the structure of the code might change 'slightly'. Class names usually stay the same.

EX4 to MQ4 decompiler, ARMAGEDDON V12.9.0 is a sophisticated software and it is unlimited with no expiration limit. Antennas and wave propagation by gsnraju free. It can also work on heavily encrypted.

If you want to reverse engineer code generating a readable code is only the first step. The next step would be to transcript your result into something understandable. IgnoredThat is the moral standard we are looking for. Why should we value traffic laws if no one gets hurt. Why not just steal someones code who has put much time and thought into it just because I want to be rich.

Why shouldn't we just steal all the stuff we need from the stores, they will just lay around in the storage anyways. It's the fact that you do not honor the wish of the person you are working with. If everyone thinks like this there will be no one posting code anymore. And yes decompiling code comes equal to stealing an idea. I used to put online a lot of code in the past and sometimes when I feel like it I will still do so but if someone comes along and tries to abuse this it just makes me not wanting to contribute anything. If it is so important to you to change the code and you want to make money why don't you pay this person an adequate amount of money?

If I would not be able to code and want something that helps me earn money I would be happy to pay for it. People just do not understand how much time goes into coding. IgnoredI learnt to write codes from no prior computer programming background(I have a long way to go to be a competent coder). The way I do it is to cannibalize code structures from other peoples works to use them when it fits into my requirement, I have to search the web code factory for the appropriate spare part. How will this be possible for someone like me to 'write' my own codes if not for the vast number of mq4 files freely shared on the net? I do this to explore my ideas. I can agree the work that goes into writing codes is trivialized by some but not all, we cannot expect everyone to know about the work that they are unfamiliar with, neither can we expect everyone to have a grateful attitude.

Indicators and EAs that are shared on forums for free ALWAYS involves hard work, knowledge, expertise and skill, and there is someone out there who is GRATEFUL that you magnanimously and generously shared it for free, I am one such person. And the truth is I won't be where I am today if there was none of these free codes shared on the net in the 1st place, am I not forever grateful?

There is always 2 sides to consider, the good and the bad, and which is the more important will be the guide - it's in the way we look at them. About paying for the work, it is not always possible to do so. There are codes that I will be more than happy to pay for but I am not able to contact the originator or the originator refuses to sell his code.

I see it as a 2 pronged issue within another 2 pronged base. One is the business of writing codes. The other is the proper accreditation given to the person who wrote the code.