Blazt Nissan Consult Usb Cable Software

Only poorly programmed software (which some of the older stuff may be) wont be able to handle the slightly higher response time of a quality usb/serial converter (i.e. FTDI) over a native serial port. All nissan consult software i know of works fine with a usb/serial port - since the native USB cables (i.e. Ecutalk, blazt, plms) are all. Nissan Data Scan - Nissan Data Scan ver. 1.5 Can be purchased with the consult cables. Datalog Viewer - Untitled Document Used to graph data captured by Nissan Data Scan ConZult-Free - Conzult diagnostic software Free but very basic SRtalk Beta - ZControl.net Free ZTalk V1.1 - ZControl.net Free CalumSult - Index of /~cjohns32/calumsult Free.

I was just on the blaZt website checking out their prices: * RS232 Nissan OBD cable + Datascan USD $95.50 * USB Nissan OBD + Datascan USD $114.50 * Datascan USD $33.50 * USB to RS232 serial converter USD $46 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On eBay a NISSAN Consult Diagnostic Interface Tool sells for $12.99 and looks sturdier than the blaZt. Also on eBay the USB to RS232 Serial 9Pin Cable Adapter sells for $3.21 shipped. Questions: 1. Am I missing something here?2. Doesn't the eBay tool appear to be better built than the blaZt?3. Will the blaZt do something better or more than than the eBay tool?

I am told that a there's only one particular serial to USB converter chipset that will work with the serial Consult adapters. I would avoid the serial interface adapter and buy the one that is made with a USB output if you are wanting to use it with a computer that only accepts USB inputs. For some reason I like the looks of this one, but I don't have any experience with it. Good price though, and he has the 'make an offer' option - so you might be able to get it for less. Heath Modified by Q451990 at 2:26 PM 5/28/2009. Mattd1979 wrote:I was wondering if you got any further along with your search for a good interface?

I see that the pic that you posted has 2 connectors inside. It seems that there is a connector missing that would connect to the computer side. Where did you find that pic? I can't seem to find the site where I got that pic from.

I've searched for the last 30 mins and no luck. If I find it later on, I'll post the website. Another product I've been looking at: and the CONSULT that never made it: Modified by lino at 2:42 PM 7/1/2009. Lino wrote:1.

Am I missing something here?2. Doesn't the eBay tool appear to be better built than the blaZt?3. Will the blaZt do something better or more than than the eBay tool?1.

Yes, shipping cost. Blazt is $15USD, wouldnt be surprised if you're ebay chinese one was $20-30 to make up the difference to the $40 or whatever the others sell for. Plms is also another $20 or something with fees and shipping. Ulver full discography torrent download. Ecutalk listed price is inclusive of postage and everything (and AUD so about 80% in USD due to exchange rate) 2.

Bigger/less convenient, moulded (not genuine) consult connectors, circuit big enough to be hand soldered (more likely to have errors/issues than machine soldered), and maybe the biggest thing no one realises - the body of their box sticks out from the consult port and digs holes in ur knee. They also dont test the cables at manufacture/assembly, and most ebay resellers dont tes them either (they sometimes arrive dead or not wired right). Pretty sure all ecutalk/blazt/plms ones are tested after being made so much lower defect rate 3. If they all work then they all have the same purpose/funtionality, theyre all made for same software etc to do same thing. In the end, if u cant afford an ecutalk/plms/blazt one id roll the dice with one of the chinese ones, assuming you dont want to use it too often and can otherwise deal with the box sticking out of the consult port area (or if ur lucky, your consult port isnt attached to fuse box so you can do something about it). If it happens to not work it may take a while for it to be returned and u sent another etc, but it is definitely the cheapest route to go.